Life under threat here? |
It was not an unexpected decision. When there is a
conflict between development and environment, it’s often the development which
will get higher priority. After all, there will be a lot of hue and cry in
favour of development; moreover, those birds, animals, plants etc don’t have
any voting rights. So it’s easy. Only problem governments have to overcome is the
opposition of small group of environmentalists and scientists – easier, compared
to public outcry for jobs, income and social security.
Governments elected for 5 years might be more interested
in short term benefits than long term consequences - which may come after a
couple of decades.
Great Barrier Reef - world's largest coral structure,
located on eastern coast of Australia, extends more than 2600 km. These areas
are also blessed with coal deposits, whose demand is very high and consumers
are located in faraway regions like Asia, Europe, Americas and probably in
Africa.
For transporting coal and other minerals, Australia needs
a huge, high capacity, deep sea port. Unfortunately, port (Abbot Point) they identified
for this purpose is located on above said coastline.
BBC reports that, "Australian authorities have
approved a project to dump dredged sediment in the Great Barrier Reef marine NP
as part of a project to create one of the world's biggest coal ports."
UNESCO's World Heritage Committee its 37th session
(CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL
HERITAGE: 16-27 June 2013) noted that,
"notes with concern that the impacts of poor water
quality and ongoing coastal development on the reef continue and progress
toward addressing them is limited...requests the State Party to urgently
address these issues, including by making urgent commitments to:
a) Maintain, and increase where necessary financial
investment in the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan and associated Reef Rescue
measures...
b) Ensure rigorously that development is not permitted if
it would impact individually or cumulatively on the OUV of the property, or
compromise the Strategic Assessment or the resulting long-term plan for the
sustainable development of the property,
c) Ensure that no port developments or associated port
infrastructure are permitted outside the existing and long-established major
port areas within or adjoining the property,
d) Ensure that the legislation protecting the property
remains strong and adequate to maintain and enhance its OUV;"
As the decision is already taken, I can only hope that
"strict mitigation measures" pointed out by GBRMPA will be
implemented in letter and spirit. Let me remained you - commodity for export is
'Coal' and reef is vulnerable.
References