Sunday, August 9, 2020

Will New Delhi Announce Final Naga Peace Accord on this Independence Day?

PM Narendra Modi and T.Muivah

The million-dollar question in the air is, will this year mark the end of the longest-running insurgency campaign in independent India? Talks are on in an undisclosed location in New Delhi, between senior officials of Central Government and NSCN-IM leaders led by general secretary Thuengaleng Muivah, to reach such an agreement. 'M' in the group's name represents T.Muivah - the veteran of Naga Insurgency who is now in his late 80s. Representatives of Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh, who also have lot of stakes in the settlement, are present in the capital. Prime Minister’s representative for talks, R.N.Ravi (who is also the governor of Nagaland) will soon arrive in the capital.

However, lately, all is not well between the governor and Naga insurgency groups. Recently Governor invoked his powers under article 371A of the constitution; and said his approval is necessary for transferring and posting of officials above district level. Reason cited was the parallel taxation of state residents by NSCN-IM and other insurgency groups. Though NSCN-IM issued statements, groups seem to separate governor from central government and sounds interested in working with New Delhi. Since the parallel taxation by insurgency groups are nothing new, it is possible that Nagas are not willing to relent on something which is not possible for New Delhi to agree.

The main roadblocks are - flag, constitution, and territory. I do not think New Delhi will agree on separate constitution for Nagaland. All are too aware of the mess created by Article 370. As far as territory is concerned, it is difficult to negotiate. Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Assam will not be willing to give their territory to Nagaland so that NSCN-IM can claim a greater Nagalim. Even if governments of neighboring states agreed, it is tough for the political dispensation to sell that idea to their people. Remaining one is the flag, maybe New Delhi will allow Nagaland to have a state flag.

Along with NSCN-IM; Naga National Political Groups (NNPG) - a joint forum of seven other Naga organizations - is also supposed to sign the same agreement. As per reports, NNPG successfully concluded their negotiations with New Delhi.

History of Naga Insurgency

Pre-Independence

Demand for a sovereign territory for Naga people probably dates to the pre-independence era. The original demand was for an independent greater Nagalim by integrating Naga inhabited territories of India and Myanmar.

As a forum for Naga Groups, then Deputy Commissioner of Naga Hills District, C.R.Pawsey, established 'Naga Hills District Tribal Council' in 1945. Next year, this council was reorganized as a political organization and named as 'Naga National Council (NNC)'. A lot of talks happened and NNC reached a nine-point agreement (aka 'Naga-Akbar Hydari Accord') with then governor of Assam - Sir Muhammad Saleh Akbar Hydari on 26-28 June 1947. In those days Nagaland was not a separate state, but a part of Assam. Ten tribal groups signed this agreement.

Under the accord, Nagas will have the rights on,

1. Judicial - all cases civil and criminal between Nagas in Naga hills will be disposed of by Naga courts under Naga law or such laws introduced with the consent of Nagas. People can appeal to the governor if the verdict is a death penalty or exile. If the case is between Nagas and Non-Nagas, and the judge is not a Naga, then the judge will be assisted by a Naga assessor.

2. Executive - What Naga council is prepared to pay for, should be controlled by Naga Council. This includes Agricultural, Public Works, Education and Forest departments.

3. Legislative - Laws passed by the Assam or Central Legislature would not affect the agreement or the religious practices of Nagas; unless Naga Council agrees to that. In case of disputes, it will be referred to the governor.

4. Land - Non-Naga cannot have land or resources in Naga Hill unless Naga Council agree to the same.

5. Taxation - Naga Council will be responsible for taxation and its expenditure.

6. Boundaries - As far as possible, bring all Nagas under one unified administrative unit.

7. Arms Act - Deputy commissioner will act on advice of Naga Council.

8. Regulations - Chin Hills regulations and Nengal Eastern Frontier Regulations will remain in force.

9. Period of agreement - 10 years. After that, it can be extended, or a new agreement can be negotiated.

Indian Constituent Assembly refused to ratify the accord. While Nagas were thinking of a sovereign state, the Constituent Assembly was thinking more of a district autonomy within Indian constitution.

In June 1947, Nehru rejected Naga's demand for separate electorates. During this time Angami Zapu Phizo (A.Z Phizo) was on the rise in NNC. NNC met with other tribal groups and tried to convince them to form independent countries instead of joining with the Indian Union. This did not gain any momentum. On August 14, 1947 - one day before Indian independence - Nagas declared their independence.  

Post-Independence

Phizo was arrested on the charges of creating trouble in India-Burma border, and sent to Presidency Jail in Culcutta. After his release, he became the president of NNC. In 1949, he became the chairman of NNC by a margin of one vote. After this, NNC was more oriented towards independence. Phizo asked for a plebiscite on the question of Naga independence. This was rejected by New Delhi. NNC went ahead and conducted one on their own and declared that 99.9% of people voted in favor of them. Results were immediately rejected by Assam and New Delhi. I often wonder why groups claim to have 99.9 or 99% voted in their favor when claiming 80-90% looks more realistic and believable. NNC was on an inevitable collision path with the Government of India (GoI).

GoI started where British left. Naga Hills District placed under Part A tribal Area and was administered as an autonomous district by Government of Assam. Naga Tribal Area (Tuensang) became Part B tribal area and administrated by Governor of Assam.

In 1952 India conducted her first elections. This was rejected by Naga separatists. Next year, 1953, Nehru met Burmese Prime Minister 'U Nu' to conclude discussions on India-Burma borders. This did not go well with separatists. They thought it as a plan to divide Naga regions. Since Nagas live in both countries they were looking for integrating all Naga areas ruled by both countries.

In the early 1950's NNC decided to boycott GoI and posted notices which threaten government employees (mainly Nagas). Government launched police action and passed 'Assam Maintenance of Public Order (autonomous Districts)' act in 1953. Assam State Armed Police and Assam Rifles moved in; but they were not able to quell the insurgency. The ground situation worsened and the government enacted the 'Assam Disturbed Areas Act' in 1955. This provided the required legal framework for paramilitary forces and armed state police to operate in the region.

In 1954, Phizo formed 'People's Sovereign Republic of Free Nagaland'. During this time, there were troubles in the leadership. Angami leaders T.Sakhrie (secretary of NNC) and J.B.Jasokie broke off with Phizo. Sakhrie was murdered later (1956). Other dissenters took refuge under GoI. NNC established Naga Federal Government (NFG) and Naga Federal Army (NFA) in 1956. Same year Phizo fled to East Pakistan. From 1957 to 1971 East Pakistan provided them weapons and ammunition. In 1960 Phizo fled to London and he stayed there until his death.

When situation worsened further, The Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers Ordinance 1958 was signed by President of India Dr. Rajendra Prasad on May 22, 1958. Later the ordinance was replaced by 'Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers Act 1958' on September 11, 1958. Disturbed Areas Act and AFPSA are still in use in states hit by insurgency. This act provides extraordinary powers to the Armed Forces. There is a lot of demand to repeal this law from people living in those areas.

Naga People’s Convention (NPC) was convened in Kohima in 1957; in Mokokchung in 1958 and again in 1959. Nehru and head of NPC Imkongliba Ao agreed for a separate state for Nagas under Indian Union in 1962. Imkongliba Ao became the head of the interim assembly in 1961. Though weakened this did not stop the insurgency. Army and militants clashed in Manipur in March 1961 which resulted in the death of 16 militants. Five months later, Imkongliba Ao was shot and he died two days later.

After the formation of Nagaland

GoI created Nagaland on Dec 1, 1963. Elections were conducted next year and Nagas signed a ceasefire agreement with the government. As per some estimations by that time around 4000 people died in the conflict. Another problem was, there were so factions that had different opinions and claimed to speak on behalf of Nagas.

In 1964 Nagaland legislative assembly passed a resolution urging GoI to integrate Naga areas in neighboring states to Nagaland. Naga militants went on fighting the government and bombed public places - a train, railway station in Lumding, Diphu etc. Numerous people died in these bombings. Some reports claim that China also gave military training to Nagas in Yunnan province starting from January 1967. As per some reports, another 4000 people got killed in between 1964 and 1972.

In 1966 the government of Indira Gandhi conducted six round of talks with Nagas in New Delhi.

An assassination attempt and further conflicts

Militias tried to assassinate Nagaland Chief Minister (CM) Hokishe Sema near Kohima. He escaped, but three other people died. GoI, ended ceasefire unilaterally in 1972. In 1975 assembly was dissolved, and the state came under the presidential rule. Same year NNC faction led by A.Z.Phizo's brother K.Y.Phizo signed Shillong accord with GoI. This gave Naga regions limited autonomy within the union. A.Z Phizo rejected Shillong accord in London.

Later Indian prime minister Morarji Desai met A.Z. Phizo in London in 1977. This didn’t result in any accord. President's rule was withdrawn, and elections were held in 1977.

In 1980 NNC split and Thuingaleng Muivah and Isak Chisi Swu and SS Khaplang established the ‘National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN)’ on January 31, 1980. This group continued with their insurgency. In 1990 A.Z.Phizo died in London.

NSCN split in to two in 1988 – NSCN-IM and NSCN-K.

NSCN continued their violent attacks and government hit back. In 1993 fight broke out between ethnic kukis of Manipur and NSCN. 86 people died in tribal clashes in 1993. In 1993, NSCN massacred around 100 Kukis in Zapati district of Manipur. They killed 16 more kukis - mostly women and children in Manipur, in 1994. Later leaders of Nagas and Kukis signed a peace accord in 1994 in Kohima. This did not stop NSCN from killing Kukis in Manipur.

In 1996, then Prime Ministers P.V. Narasimha Rao offered to hold unconditional talks with Naga groups. In 1997 H.D. Deve Gowda met NCSN leaders at Geneva. Later I.K. Gujral also offered to negotiate with Naga groups in 1997. NSCN-IM faction agreed to a ceasefire which came in to effect in 1997. Nagaland CM, S.C. Jamir met NSCN-K and NNC faction at Atlanta (USA) and conducted discussions. Fortunately, S.C. Jamir survived another assassination attempt in Kohima that year.

1998 saw more talks between GoI and NSCN-IM in Bangkok and they agreed to extend the ceasefire by one year. Later that year, then Indian prime minister Vajpayee met Muivah and Isak in Paris and continued their talks later in Amsterdam. In 2001 negotiations were continued in Osaka. The government let Muivah and Isak come back to Nagaland after long periods of exile. In 2000 NSCN-K announced a 6-month ceasefire. This ceasefire extended when it reaches the expiration date. As per some reports, another 17,000 people died during 1972 to 2001. 

It is interesting to see the locations of these discussions – Paris, Amsterdam, London, Atlanta, Osaka, Bangkok. You might be wonder how the insurgents are financed and who finance them. We will look into that at the end of this article.

Negotiations were shifted to Kohima. A breakthrough came when GoI announced in 2002 that it will not renew the ban on NCSN. In a setback to NSCN-K Burmese troops attacked their HQ in western Burma in 2003.

Manmohan Singh continued negotiations with NSCN leaders in New Delhi. The ceasefire was more observed in its breaking than on its holding. In addition to fighting with government, Naga militants were also fighting against each other.

Burmese Army conducted a couple more operations against NSCN-K. Three-time lucky, Jamir survived another assassination attempt in 2007. Manmohan Singh government-imposed president's rule on Nagaland in 2008. Within three months elections were conducted.

Later in 2010 leaders of several Naga groups signed agreements with GoI in Kohima, in 2010. Ture to its nature, NSCN split gain on 2011 and NSCN-KK was formed.

NSCN-K repealed the ceasefire agreement. However, this led to another split in the ranks and NSCN-R was formed. R stands for reformation - people who wanted to continue with the ceasefire.

In 2015, NSCN-IM leaders Isak and Muivah signed a framework agreement with GoI. While the other major NSCN faction, NSCN-K joined with another militia organization and broke off peace talks with GoI.  Isak Chishi Swu died in 2016. Even T.Muivan very old, in his late 80s.

NSCN

There are two main factions in NSCN. NSCN-IM and NSCN-K.

This group runs a government-in-exile - Government of the People's Republic of Nagaland (GPRN).

NSCN-IM primarily consists of Tangkhul Nagas. They have influence over Senapati, Ukhrul, Chandel and Tamenglong districts of Manipur; Wokha, Phek, Zunebhoto, Kohima and some parts of Mokokchung and Tuensang districts of Nagaland; Naga areas of North Cachar Hills and Karbi Anglong districts of Assam; and some areas of Arunanchal Pradesh.

T.Muivah, the General Secretary, and Isak Chisi Swu, The Chairman of NSCN-IM were earlier based in Thailand.

This outfit's military wing is called the Naga Army. As per some reports, it has one brigade and six battalions. Town commands and specialized mobile groups are also available to boost muscle power.

Politically NSCN-IM has 11 regions that are delimited based on tribal considerations. They try to run a parallel government wherever possible. The administration is divided into defence, home, finance, foreign, education, information and publicity, forests and minerals, law and justice, and religious affairs.

GPRN is responsible for interacting with world bodies, media, garner support, and raise funds for operations. NSCN-IM's annual budget runs into crores.

Allegedly major source of income for this group is drug trafficking from Myanmar, along with extortion, bank robberies, and other criminal activities. In addition, the outfit generates funds internationally.

Both NSCN-IM and NSCN-K run parallel structures of taxation throughout the regions under their control.

They also receive assistance from neighboring countries - supply of arms and ammunition, logistics, safe havens, camping, and training facilities. It is believed that till 1971 US also supplied them arms, finance and intelligence. Some articles state that, till the late 1980s, China also provided support. Pakistan’s ISI is reported to be the major backer now.

After NSCN-K was waked out of the ceasefire agreement with GoI, they were reported to be behind the attack on an army convoy in Manipur which killed 18 soldiers of 6th Dogra Regiment of the Indian Army. After this incident Tatmadaw (Myanmarese army) took control of NSCN-K headquarters in Sagaing region of Myanmar. Group head S.S.Khaplang also died in 2017. This considerably weakened the organization.

Conclusion

Every time India government concludes an agreement with Naga outfits another one pops up and keeps the insurgency humming. Almost all prime ministers of India negotiated with the groups and many reached significant breakthroughs. But then some other group comes up. Hope that time such a thing will not happen.

Continuing negotiations shows, the importance of a political process to resolve things. An army can win the day on the ground, but it must be backed by a strong pollical process. Without this political framework, the military gain will whither away. At the same, we also need to open up the state and show that we meant it.

Sajeev

References:

1. Naga-Akbar Hydari Accord (Nine Point Agreement)

2. India/Nagas (1947-present)

3. Naga National Council - Wikipedia

4. Angami Zapu Phizo

5. Nagaland - Wikipedia

6. Myanmar Army Takes Control of NSCN-Khaplang Headquarters –The Wire

Saturday, August 8, 2020

What Beirut Explosion Teach us? Isn’t there a ‘Warehouse 12’ in every country?

Copyright, Christina Drakaki, via marinetraffic.com

'MV Rhosus' - Russian owned and carrying Moldovan flag - left from Batumi, Georgia (the country, not the state of US). The destination was Beira in Mozambique. On the way, captain got an order to take additional cargo – destined for Jordan - from Beirut (there are different versions on why ship stopped in Beirut). Captain Prokoshev redirected the ship to Beirut port. As per captain, even then, the ship was leaking but it was seaworthy. At the port, crew was not able to board the heavy equipment (additional cargo) and the owner failed to pay the port fees. Another version says that MV Rhosus was forced to dock at Beirut port due to technical difficulties. This happened in September 2013. As per lawyers, authorities inspected the ship declared that it is forbidden from sailing.

In short, they captured 27-year-old MV Rhosus along with its cargo. What was the cargo?  2,750 bags of Ammonium Nitrate. Ship sent her last message indicating her position on Aug 7, 2014. Lebanese authorities released her crew also on that month. By this time, ships charterers and company which owns the cargo lost interest in the ship. Maybe they do not want to spend more money on that. Owners also abandoned the ship. Her dangerous cargo was moved to 'Warehouse 12' and ship was also abandoned by port authorities right in the pier. She stayed there for three years. ‘MV Rhosus’ started leaking heavily and started sinking on Feb 2018. Looks like port authorities did not care much on this submerged ship since she was not blocking the path.

Ammonium Nitrate

This chemical is commonly used for manufacturing fertilizers. This is also a dual use substance, as it can also be mixed with fuel to make explosives. If not handled with care this can explore and cause huge destruction. On Aug 12, 2015 800 tonnes of ammonium nitrate exploded in a contained storage station at Port of Tianjin, China killing This resulted in other explosions and killed 173 out of which 104 were fire fighters. Before that, similar explosions happened in Australia, US, Mexico, North Korea, Romania, Spain, France etc.

What Authorities Did?

As per customs they sent six letters to judiciary asking for the solution of the cargo on June 27, December 5, 2014; May 6, 2015; May 20, October 13, 2016; and October 27, 2017.

Was just sending letters to the judiciary was enough? That also just 6 letters in 7 years. They seem to send the letter to Judge – Urgent matters. What happened to those letters? Was it followed up with political administration? Why judiciary did not respond (as per customs) to those letters?

Explosion

On Aug 4 a fire, probably started from another warehouse entered warehouse 12 and ignited ammonium nitrate which resulted in a huge blast, the sound of which was heard more than 200 km away. This blast and destruction are crushing for a country that ran to the ground by her administrators. Lebanon was not always like this. She has a long history all the way to bronze ages. Modern Lebanon was under the Ottoman empire. After the victory in the first world was French got Greater Lebanon. Her current boundaries are defined by the ‘Treaty of Sevres – 1920’.

After 23 years of French rule, Lebanon got her independence in the middle of World War II in 1943. Her capital Beirut became the regional center for trade and became a financial hub. 15 year-long civil war changed everything. It crushed the country; Taif agreement brought peace but it was always a delicate balance. Even now protests are going on in Lebanon; this one started last October. It will take more than an article to explain the problems faced by Lebanon. Let us investigate what we can learn from the blasts.

Governments across the globe need to learn a lot from this blast.

1. Create a safe protocol to handle explosives and follow it in letter and spirit. In a lot of countries, there are protocols for everything; but hardly anyone follows that.

2. Be extra careful with nerve agents, biological warfare labs, nuclear development and testing etc. All these facilities should be far away from human population centers; in an area where it is easy to contain the worst-case scenarios.

3. Items of dual-use - like ammonium nitrate which can be used to make fertilizers as well bombs - if captured from smugglers or otherwise should be disposed of immediately. There should be huge personal fines on people who fail to do so.

4. All such accidents should be investigated transparently, and reports should be made public.

5. If any authority keeps such unsafe/fragile/dangerous items in population centers then it should be moved to safe isolated places or disposed of.

6. Since the location of explosives and such warehouses hardly ever made public, common people are not aware of this. Authorities are doubly responsible in these cases.

7. One should not wait till next accident to make another change.

Beirut Port was nicknamed as ‘Cave of Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves’ for its alleged role as the center of corruption. The accusation is Lebanon lost billions of dollars in tax revenue due to undervaluing imports, systematic and widespread bribery to avoid paying customs tax at this port. 

A lot of countries have institutions accused of such things. Always remember, stealing is one thing which may be forgiven but losing life due to neglect in the labyrinth of the bureaucratic system is beyond redemption.

Sajeev

References

1. Ship citied in Beirut blast hasn't sailed in 7 years. We Found It - NYT

2. 2019–2020 Lebanese protests - Wikipedia

3. Taif Agreement - Wikipedia

4. A big blast should lead to big change in Lebanon - TheEconomist

5. Beirut blast: Tracing the explosives that tore thecapital apart - AlJazeera

International Phonetic Alphabet - How to make others understand

Used by NATO, International Civil Aviation Organization, etc. this pronunciation is well understood across the world. I was searching for this list for some time. Hope that it will be useful for you as well. When you use this structure, the person on the other end of the telephone better understands the spelling.


Sajeev

References
1. Wikipedia

Monday, August 3, 2020

Getting Paid is the right of the Creator: Will new laws force Google and Facebook to do that?

It is the fundamental right of a creator to get paid for his/her product(s) and (or) service(s). Using that to generate revenue, and not sharing that revenue with the creator is nothing but theft of intellectual property. Not getting paid for quality work, not only deprive the creator of his livelihood but also reduce the motivation to do so. It is a loss for society in the long term.

The seriousness of this crime does not come down just because the product we discuss here are news articles. The fight against content aggregators and traffic drivers like Google, Facebook, etc. are going on for some time. The accusation is, they make revenue out of contents but fail to pay or share it with content generators.

Before the digital era came, media created their content and got paid in the form of ad revenue and user subscription fees. In the digital age, local news outlets have less control over the news they published online. They hardly have any wherewithal to bargain with transnational media behemoths like Google and Facebook. These two drove a lot of traffic to their sites; they also display snippets from these media organizations and use it to design their own products. In this deal, local media outlets lost everything. Let me remind you, it is often these local newspapers which stay close to people on the ground and report on community issues which affect the daily life of citizens. 

Recently the Australian government asked Facebook and Google to share revenue generated from news articles with traditional media. They must negotiate in good faith. If they refuse, there will be a binding arbitration process and penalties up to A$10 million (US$7 million) or 10% of local revenue.

It is not the first time; any government is asking them to do so. In April, France ordered Google to negotiate in good faith with local media firms and pay for what they use. Later a law was introduced last year to “transpose a pan-EU copyright reform that intended to extend publisher rights to news snippets”.

What google did? Instead of paying publishers for using their content, “they stopped displaying content that is covered by the law in local search and Google News”. Earlier Google found out workarounds in Spain and Germany. What will they do this time? Sooner or later law in similar lines will be passed in US congress. Why do not do the right thing now itself?

Sajeev

References

1. No more free rides: Australia orders Facebook, Google to share advertising revenue from news articles with media organizations- SCMP 

2. Making internet majors pay for news content they make money from - ET

Sunday, August 2, 2020

When France Demanded 15mn franc from Haiti to recognize her independence

A facsimile of the bank note for the 30 million francs that Haiti borrowed from a French bank. Credit: Lepelletier de Saint-Remy, 'Étude Et Solution Nouvelle de la Question Haïtienne.'

Indians are aware of the demands to compensate former colonies by their colonial overloads for draining the economy; and to apologize for the crimes they committed during the colonial era. In India, there are three main demands, first one is to apologize for the massacre of unarmed civilians in 1919 in Jalian Wala Bagh; the second one is for the return of Kohinoor diamonds; now many people also demands compensation from the British for systematic draining of Indian economy.

I do not think the British will ever fulfill the second demand. After all, it will open pandora’s box and soon British museums will be empty. Apologizing for the massacre is something that they can and should do. Expressing sincere regret for carrying out such a brutal massacre of unarmed civilians by people in uniform; that too in a province which abundantly supplied so many men to fight for British in first world war and later in second world war is the right thing to do.

However, this article is not about India or British. It is about a poor country in the Caribbeans called Haiti and their former colonial overloads – the French.

French asked money for recognizing Haiti’s independence, which Haitians were not able to refuse. Paying the same not only destroyed their economy but also hampered the development of Haitians ins in every possible way for a very long time.  

I always thought Haiti was a poor country. After reading the article – 'When France Extorted Haiti – the Greatest Heist in History' - it looks like they were not and paying indemnify to French made them poor.

I will give you the tragic story in short. For reading it in detail, please open the link mentioned in references.

French brought slavery to Haiti in the 17th century. Later in 18th century, Haitians rebelled and declared independence in 1804. 

It was not that French simply looked the other way. They tried to arrest the movement. To assert French control, Napoleon sent 20,000 soldiers and as many sailors under the command of his brother-in-law. Most of the French army died due to yellow fever. Overall 50,000 French troops died in an attempt to retake Haiti. This includes a whopping number of French generals - 18. They were able to capture Haitian leader who later died in captivity. 

Slaves under the command of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, Alexandre Pétion and Henry Christophe continued fighting against French and decisively defeated them in the Battle of Vertières. After losing this battle, French gave up the idea of a North American Empire; withdrew 7000 troops from the island and sold Louisiana to US. Post-independence there was a massacre of whites in Haiti and a lot of white people migrated to Cuba and later to New Orleans.

Haiti was split into two. Pétion – ruler of the south - wanted France to recognize their independence and was ready to pay in lines of what the US paid to Napoleon for purchasing Louisiana (15mn francs). Louis XVIII rejected that offer. Later, Jean-Pierre Boyer reunited the country and he was determined to gain at least suzerainty.

At first Charles X, then ruler of France rejected that idea. He later sends a fleet to Haiti to restore the French monarchy. Under pressure, Boyer agreed to a treaty in which French recognized Haiti's independence if they pay 150mn francs.

“The present inhabitants of the French part of St. Domingue shall pay … in five equal installments … the sum of 150,000,000 francs, destined to indemnify the former colonists.”

Remember that the US paid only 15mn francs for entire Louisiana. That was 2,140,000 km2 of land. Louisiana was later divided into multiple states. Currently, this land is part of – ‘Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska; portions of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado (east of the continental divide), Minnesota (west of Mississippi river), the northeastern section of New Mexico, northern portions of Texas, New Orleans, portions of Louisiana (west of Mississippi river), small portions of land in Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan. Compare that with Haiti, which is small.

Haiti borrowed 30mn franc from French banks and paid their first installment. They defaulted soon. Later in 1838 outstanding amount was revised to 60mn franc. That means a total of 90mn. To get the gravity of this number one need to see that the annual French budget at that time was one-fifth of this amount!!! Haiti stopped investing in the development of her citizens and continued to pay until 1947. In addition to paying the French, they also had to pay the interest to the banks for all the loans.  They got political independence but fell into economic misery.

Even then western nations refused to recognize Haiti immediately. Britain recognized her in 1833. US refused to do so till 1862.

Sajeev

References

You can read the full story here: When France Extorted Haiti – the Greatest Heist in History